Letters by Burk

Letters by Burk

Share this post

Letters by Burk
Letters by Burk
Rethinking Nutrient Essentiality: Why Non-Essential Doesn't Mean Non-Beneficial

Rethinking Nutrient Essentiality: Why Non-Essential Doesn't Mean Non-Beneficial

Does Non-Essential Equal Non-Beneficial in Nutrition Science

Burk's avatar
Burk
Dec 17, 2023
∙ Paid

Share this post

Letters by Burk
Letters by Burk
Rethinking Nutrient Essentiality: Why Non-Essential Doesn't Mean Non-Beneficial
Share

Fundamental to nutrition science is classifying nutrients as either essential or non-essential. This binary view suggests some nutrients are expendable while others are indispensable. But does this simplistic dualism reveal or obscure the true complexity of nutrients' impacts on health? This article scrutinizes the science behind nutrient essentiality, arguing the line between essential and non-essential is far blurrier than it appears.

Examining the Meaning of Essential Nutrients

To evaluate essential nutrients, we must first define the term. The medical reference Free Dictionary states essential nutrients are:

"Nutritional substances that are required for optimal health...these must be in the diet because they are not formed metabolically within the body."

This frames essentiality around whether our bodies can synthesize a nutrient from scratch. If we must obtain a nutrient from food because we cannot make it ourselves, it earns the label "essential."

At first glance, this neatly categor…

Keep reading with a 7-day free trial

Subscribe to Letters by Burk to keep reading this post and get 7 days of free access to the full post archives.

Already a paid subscriber? Sign in
© 2025 Burk
Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice
Start writingGet the app
Substack is the home for great culture

Share