Rethinking Nutrient Essentiality: Why Non-Essential Doesn't Mean Non-Beneficial
Does Non-Essential Equal Non-Beneficial in Nutrition Science
Fundamental to nutrition science is classifying nutrients as either essential or non-essential. This binary view suggests some nutrients are expendable while others are indispensable. But does this simplistic dualism reveal or obscure the true complexity of nutrients' impacts on health? This article scrutinizes the science behind nutrient essentiality, arguing the line between essential and non-essential is far blurrier than it appears.
Examining the Meaning of Essential Nutrients
To evaluate essential nutrients, we must first define the term. The medical reference Free Dictionary states essential nutrients are:
"Nutritional substances that are required for optimal health...these must be in the diet because they are not formed metabolically within the body."
This frames essentiality around whether our bodies can synthesize a nutrient from scratch. If we must obtain a nutrient from food because we cannot make it ourselves, it earns the label "essential."
At first glance, this neatly categor…
Keep reading with a 7-day free trial
Subscribe to Letters by Burk to keep reading this post and get 7 days of free access to the full post archives.