Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Green On A Budget's avatar

Maybe. But I'd argue that it depends on your niche, your vibe, and your writing style.

Take Paul Millerd, for example. I'm a huge fan of his writing. His authentic, inquisitive takes would lose their soul if forced into this kind of "punchy" structure. He may not go viral often, but his community is deeply loyal. There's something to be said for that kind of connection.

The thing is, his meandering thoughts and longer-form explorations are his brand. They invite you to think alongside him, not just consume quick takeaways. That's valuable too.

For me, whenever I've tried using AI to audit and improve my work, it almost always defaults to this snappy, bullet-pointed style without proper prompting. It's kinda annoying, honestly. The tools seem to think every piece of writing needs to be optimized for maximum skimmability.

But some ideas need room to breathe. Some thoughts require you to sit with them for a while. Not everything has to be a Twitter thread disguised as a blog post.

Don't get me wrong. The advice in the original post is solid for certain contexts. But let's not throw the baby out with the bathwater. There's still a place for writers who trust their readers to stick around for the full journey.

Expand full comment
Mosope Eunice's avatar

Thnk you for this!

Expand full comment
9 more comments...

No posts